decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I don't understand... | 360 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
The key must be in the TPM chip
Authored by: kawabago on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 11:56 PM EDT
The key is installed at the time of manufacture, you can't
change it after the fact. It's a wonderful system, for
vendors, it can't be updated. Once the secure boot system has
been bypassed by malware, there will be no way to fix the
problem. Don't want the same malware infecting your computer
again? Buy a new computer.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I don't understand...
Authored by: tknarr on Saturday, June 02 2012 @ 12:24 AM EDT

As said, the public key used to sign the boot loader has to be loaded into the hardware. That leaves two cases:

  1. The BIOS has a way of adding keys to the hardware. But then the company doesn't need to go to Verisign, they can just add their own key to the hardware and sign images without needing to involve anybody else. And of course hobbyists and distributions can do the same thing. No problem.
  2. The BIOS doesn't have a way of adding keys to the hardware. In that case you can't get a key from Verisign, you have to go to whoever holds the pre-loaded keys and get them to sign your image.
The first case pretty much scuttles what Microsoft wants: to make it impossible to run anything but their software. I doubt any proposal they put forward will go there willingly. And the second leaves companies with a problem when they must run versions of Windows that Microsoft wants to prevent from running (see Microsoft's attempts to get XP end-of-lifed).

Myself, I'd love to see the first option implemented. That puts control of the system boot right where it belongs: in my hands. If I control what keys are in the hardware, I control what can run and what can't. The problems only come up when someone else wants control over my machine.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )