decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Huh? | 360 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Huh?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 05:30 PM EDT
"So yeah, average people in the U.S. are hostile to people
pushing slavery, no matter how disguised."

Not true.

There is at least 50% who are happy and content to live off
some one else work in a slave society where the producers
pay all bill.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

And yet... with that response....
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 05:34 PM EDT

What was it I said exactly to set you off that could even be slightly construed as my "advocation of slavery".

Of course.. you didn't say I said that. But you do speak quite highly against slavery as though I said something rather naughty. I'm just curious what, exactly, it was I said or that you perceived me to have said beyond the context of simply pointing out:

    When people hear Communist, they react strongly!
BTW: your response proves that point :)

To make such a statement without speaking to the pros and cons of taking a position is simply stating what I view as a normal response from the average person.

I could just have easily made a specific statement as:

    When you have a nice sunny day, blue skies, little puffy clouds, nice green plant life.... people tend to not want to be at work!
It's just as valid... but I'm sure you wouldn't automatically speak as though you're insinuating I advocated something like slavery.

Caveat - Just to clarify my position on slavery: Even though I live in a Country whose Laws have done away with Capital Punishment, I lean in the direction of International Laws which still carry the death penalty for Human Rights Violations - at least, and I could easily be mistaken, I believe International Laws still carry that penalty.

Philosophically speaking:

Evil is a very strong word. And I believe to enslave another human being is the worst thing any human can do to another. As a result, if anyone is going to be classified as evil, it should be those willing to perform the worst. And bottom line is: Evil has earned the right to be destroyed so Society is better protected from the harm Evil will cause.

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Huh?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 02 2012 @ 12:57 AM EDT
Opposition of Communism is based on rejection of the dictatorship of the
proletariat. The Soviet-style asserted and spread that Marxist ideal and was a
direct threat to the Constitutional democratic republic and thus we maintained a
Cold War against them. The more open Chinese form was not perceived a direct
threat to the constituted government and we got in bed with them. They are a
'Most Favored Nation'.

The original Constitution permitted slavery and it took the President who was
congratulated by Karl Marx on his election, Lincoln, to change that.

What was your point?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Huh? - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 03 2012 @ 01:38 AM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )