|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 07:03 PM EDT |
It does mention:
Oracle’s controversial decision to hire an
ethically-challenged blogger
But there's not mention on the amount.
Not that I can see.
Following the link to an article by the same author
on the ethically challenged has:
In Mueller’s case, he is able to
parse and summarize tricky judgments more effectively than many of his
credentialed counterparts and does not make any obvious
mistakes.
With a statement like that combined with what I've viewed
as Mueller's understanding of various Legal situations... from my perspective,
such a sentiment only hurts the authors potential value of someone to go to for
an appropriate, informed opinion.
I wonder if the author holds the same
view in light of how Judge Alsup ruled combined with the cases sited and
Mueller's most recent statements about the Judge.
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 08:13 PM EDT |
I desperately want to see Oracle embarrassed by this. I think
a $1 win would be trumpeted by them as a moral victory. But I
think that they'd have a lot more difficulty explaining to
shareholders that they spent millions for a $60 win.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 09:27 PM EDT |
I think that once this is all over the Google can petition the court to pick up
their legal costs. What an embarassment that would be for Oracle.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 11:46 PM EDT |
| That is, precisely $0.00 [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
