Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 07:23 PM EDT |
Near the bottom of page7 of the PDF:
operators (e.g., +, -, *, /,
)
Should read like this:
operators (e.g., +, -, *, /,
<, >)
(emphasis mine, they are not bold
in the original)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: YurtGuppy on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 07:38 PM EDT |
doing a wonderful job,
hate to be backseat driver but,
long about page 19 the indentation
goes in but doesn't go back out
so you start losing a level.
---
a small fish in an even smaller pond[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 07:44 PM EDT |
Id. at 101. Baker held that using the same accounting
system
"Baker" should be in italics. (Page 16, line 7)
Same
thing a few lines later:
Id. at 103. Baker also established
the “merger” doctrine
Again "Baker" should be in italics. (page
16, line 21 ish)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 07:52 PM EDT |
Moreover, the CONTU report stated that Section 102(b)’s preclusion
of 12 copyright protection
should be:
Moreover,
the CONTU report stated that Section 102(b)’s preclusion of copyright
protection
(The stray number was the line number of the next line
in the original PDF).[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 09:15 PM EDT |
This may be an error in the original. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: reuben on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 09:43 PM EDT |
"admitted to copyright" -> "admitted to copying" [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 11:20 PM EDT |
I know it's important for all to review the contents of the article, but may we
have a "jump to comments" link now, please?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: ore on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 03:38 PM EDT |
On page 16, Seldon is misspelt Selden
---
Oliver Elphick[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|