decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
UEFI houses the BIOS | 392 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
UEFI houses the BIOS
Authored by: Hargoth on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 01:15 PM EDT
UEFI is an answer to x86 platform dependency upon a badly designed and way
outdated method of controlling the configuration and control of hardware that
has up to this point been done via BIOS.

Current motherboards that have UEFI, *emulate* a BIOS in the UEFI so that the
x86 based operating systems don't need anything new to run. That will change.
The Linux kernel already has a lot more flexibility regarding information
available at boot time.

The whole trusted computing initiative from years ago has settled into this new
tool, the UEFI, instead of the former effort to brand it into the hardware
layer.

Essentially, UEFI is a much larger programmable 'space' than the old BIOS.
Therefore, it is possible to introduce DRM into the UEFI.

Also, RedHat/Fedora have not made a commitment yet. The discussion has only
just begun in earnest, due to the new exposure to the issues involved.

As for what is and is not possible with this new 'trusted computing' approach,
if trusted is 'on', then you cannot build your own kernel or do anything other
than run signed applications.

For most serious Linux users, we will need to have the ability to turn trusted
mode 'off' entirely to have the same freedoms we enjoy today.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )