Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 06:28 PM EDT |
They'll appeal everything including attempting to introduce new evidence not
in the trial record :)
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 08:04 PM EDT |
Honestly, their best bet for appeal is the judge's admission
that he knows how to code.
If I were BSF, I would argue that a significant portion of
this ruling is the judge applying his personal knowledge
rather than the facts and evidence presented in the case. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: hardmath on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 08:31 PM EDT |
Like PJ, I'm sooo relieved. It's been a long wait to see this ruling in
"print", but it's a gem!
--hm
---
"Prolog is an efficient programming language because it is a very stupid theorem
prover." -- Richard O'Keefe[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|