Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

On point 2 - refer to doc 1203 Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law On Equitable Defenses | 392 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

On point 2 - refer to doc 1203 Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law On Equitable Defenses

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 11:35 AM EDT

True, the evidence in the record was perhaps not sufficient.
However, anyone not in the court would need to look at more
than the record of the case to establish the truth
(including paid bloggers). The truth is that the SEC filing
rather conclusively shows that SUN viewed it as more than
YABlog, and intended to use it as such. Claiming anything
else is either very misinformed/ignorant or just regularly
dishonest.

Using what the Judge said about the record in the case to
establish absolute truth is misleading for the same reason.
I do think Google might have done a better job had they
early on introduced that SEC filing in court though, and
criticism on that front is fair.

bosyber

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I'm not so sure - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 08:41 PM EDT
- That's how I understand it, too - Authored by: Ian Al on Saturday, June 02 2012 @ 06:30 AM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )