|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 10:12 AM EDT |
Yes, and that should get the antitrust authorities interested.
I still don't really see the need for secure boot anyway, if someone has
hardware acess tey can still do whatever you want, and it doesn't effect
anything which only has remote access.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: OmniGeek on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 02:14 PM EDT |
Recall that MS explicitly requires that the locks be unbreakable on ARM-based
Windows systems. Antitrust fodder, indeed!
---
My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on
espresso.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 02 2012 @ 10:02 AM EDT |
These UEFI computers would be legal outside the United States ? Seems the EU
should have an opinion about that.
..nnelsonn[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|