decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Comes 1524-->MS 1993 emails worried about Novell and Unix | 392 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Comes 1524-->MS 1993 emails worried about Novell and Unix
Authored by: foulis on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 06:12 PM EDT
<p
align=right><b>PLAINTIFF'S<br>EXHIBIT</b><br><u>
;1524</u><br>Comes v. Microsoft</p>
From dwaynew Wed Jan 13 19:48:35 1993<br>
X-MSMail-Message-ID: 46010E11<br>
X-MSMail-Parent-message-ID: E12F6692<br>
X-MSMail-Conversation-ID: E12f6692<br>
X-MSMail-WiseRemark: Microsoft Mail -- 3.0.729<br>
From: Dwayne Walker &lt;dwaynew@microsoft.com&gt;<br>
To: billg bradsi jimall jonl mikemap paulma tonya<br>
Date: Wed 13 Jan 93 19:49:43 PST<br>
Subject: RE: Novell<br>
Cc: dwaynew</p>
Jim</p>
This is good mail. I personally agree with you. Novell is hitting us hard from
all sides. You[sic] mail failed to mention that they are pushing FTC issues in
the background against us, strong arming channel/resellers not to carry W4W or
our networking products, attacking Windows NT hard in corporate accounts and
more.</p>
It's clear to me. We are at all out war with Lotus (especially on the Notes
front), with Novell (DR-DOS, UNIXWARE, and Netware) and with IBM OS/2 unit. The
Apple attack ads are also getting through to people. And in general, UNIX is
getting more momentum (NT PR and SDKs is slowing UNIX down some but we must
still watch the UNIX longshots).</p>
Novell is a serious threat to our entire business. I think we should strike back
even harder then[sic] you suggest. I certainly agree that we should use the
press, SDR, etc. to get their attention. If this fails, we need to "Take
the Red Out".</p>
Rumors are mounting again of a possible Novell/Lotus merger. This would be a big
problem. Remember that Lotus will release Notes and additional 1-2-3 versions on
UNIX this year (including on UNIXWARE).</p>
Dwayne</p>
----------<br>
From: Jim Allchin<br>
To: Bill Gates; Brad Silverberg; Dwayne Walker; Jonathan Lazarus; Mike Maples;
Paul Maritz; Tony Audino<br>
Subject: Novell<br>
Date: Wednesday, January 13, 1993 7:18PM</p>
It is very clear to me that Novell is at war with us. The list of attacks they
are making on us has reached an all time high.</p>
We should discuss how MS as a whole should be treating Novell. I think that we
should do the following:</p>
1. Continue to try and make peace. This means trying to resolve Access, Wfw, and
NT rights to ship code.</p>
2. Continue telling the press and customers that we are dying to work with
Novell for the sake of customers. "Ray won't return our phone calls as we
beg on our knees." Sell customers against them. The comment from Ray is
amazing. We shoudl use that against them. "Ray clearly isn't thinking of
customers...."</p>
<p align=right>MS 5041080<br>CONFIDENTIAL</p>
<hr>
<br>
3. Disinvite them from the SDR and tell them why. Inviting a competitor to a NDA
presentation regarding key technology that they can use against us doesn't make
any sense. It also, as Brad said to me, signals that business isn't going on as
usual here regarding Novell. We want some resolution on the issues in #1 and
some commitments for the future.</p>
4. Drive ahead quickly on the client side work.</p>
5. Ensure that we have white papers prepared for NT as a client against UnixWare
and for NT as a server against NetWare 4.0. In the latter paper it shold point
to the future to a new advanced DS in Cairo, etc.</p>
6. Continue helping them on NT. This is to our advantage. However, I strongly
suggest that even if we can't get rights on them letting us ship the code we
should get an agreement from them that *they* will ship the code concurrent with
NT's shipment. If we can't even get this from them, then we should use the press
against them and we should pull back the NT code. This isn't asking too much
from Novell -- just commitment that if we provide this support to them that
they'll ship and support a product based on it.</p>
Do you agree?</p>
thanks<br>
jim</p>
<p align=right>MS 5041081<br>CONFIDENTIAL</p>
<hr>
<br>
From bradsi Wed Jan 13 19:55:35 1993<br>
To: billg dwaynew jimall mikemap paulma tonya<br>
Subject: Novell<br>
Date: Wed Jan 13 19:55:34 1993</p>
don't forget, ibm, sun, and apple are not invited to the sdr either. as is very
clear now, novell is as much of an os competitor -- or more so -- as the
others.</p>
especially in the current situation, i do not feel comfortable giving them an
nda presentation on our os strategy and specific details too -- not until they
show some concrete signs of cooperation or responding to our
proposals.</p>
<p align=right>MS 5041082<br>CONFIDENTIAL</p>


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )