|
Authored by: Gringo_ on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 07:53 PM EDT |
The SSO of the APIs in a different language
with different rules
of syntax might not be covered under
his ruling.
While
anything is possible, I find your proposition
highly improbable. As a
programmer, I cannot imagine any
kind of API, in any kind of language, that
might be so
unique as to not fall under the general principals employed
by the
judge to reach his ruling. He reconfirmed the
uncopyrightability of Sony Sega's
ABI, and you can't get
anything more different than Java's API then the Sony
Play
Station ABI. That implies such a broad range of possible
interfaces are
uncopyrightable, that it is impossible to
imagine something that falls outside
of that range. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 02 2012 @ 04:36 PM EDT |
SSO is after all nothing more than a heirarchical/compound
name for a class or function - kind of like "Alan Nathan
Smith" is a hierarchical/compound name for a person.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|