|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 06:56 PM EDT |
I assume the technical detail was in there to help future courts understand that
the decision was made with some understanding of the technology.
Hopefully it will discourage appeals.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: mirrorslap on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 11:30 PM EDT |
In reading his findings in this case, I have a distinct mental impression of a
man
with a nail gun filled with shank nails (almost impossible to pull out),
happily
going about his work of nailing down the shoes of a very slippery
character. He
takes his time, lining up each nail before pulling the trigger to
render the
wriggling eel motionless, where even the higher-ups who are not
carpenters can
see the skill and thoroughness of his work. But especially, they
can see the eel
for what it is.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|