Authored by: matth on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 07:16 PM EDT |
So, they're basically saying they'll go to appeal on the points they lost most
miserably on? That has gotta be aimed at investors.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 01:50 PM EDT |
Just pretending it is not for the money, not for saving face.
I suppose if Oracle would want to make a version of Dalvik whereon
every Java program could run in the same way as on any other Java
system, ending fragmentation like they view it, I suppose it
could. With or without an agreement of Google. No?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, June 01 2012 @ 02:53 PM EDT |
"Google's implementation intentionally fragmented Java and broke the
"write once, run anywhere" promise."
1. Android is not Java.
2. Only an incompatable Java fragments Java (see 1).
3. Google 'intentionally' created Android (see 2).
4. There's no "write once, run anywhere" Android promise.
Note to Larry: once you eliminate the spin, the nothing that remains is your
copyright case...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Oh so true.... - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 03 2012 @ 09:08 AM EDT
|