decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Mueller will claim that this is a code meaning Google are guilty. | 95 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Mueller will claim that this is a code meaning Google are guilty.
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 06:48 PM EDT
Haha.. the mueller side show has been a great sidestory for
the whole trial... can't wait for the thrilling conclusion
with a twist!!! "His honour Alsup err's in finding against
Oracle's fair and reasonable copyright claims.." ???? we'll
see.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Wait, no! read the conclusion - Google clearly lost!!! /s
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 06:52 PM EDT
Google's motion for a new trial on copyright infringement is DENIED AS MOOT.

Google lost out on that bigtime :)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Mueller will claim that this is a code meaning Google are guilty.
Authored by: dio gratia on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 07:20 PM EDT
Propaganda generally won't resurrect lost causes without a causus sympatha.
There is no sympathy factor, this is about business competition on an abstract
level summed up by Mr. Ellison's words to the effect “It's not enough we
(Oracle) win, everyone else must lose", the sentiment attributed to Genghis
Khan.

The courts and laws are sometimes like mountain ranges without passes, a path
can be found around them. Sometime the way is hard and camp followers stay with
the baggage train left behind when the hard roads are taken.

If there's an appeal he'll undoubtedly write something. Will it matter to the
mountains?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )