decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
assuming you wanted to, yeah | 294 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
You mean, later this year I will be able to use the '104 invention for free?
Authored by: darrellb on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 06:55 AM EDT
What invention?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

You mean, later this year I will be able to use the '104 invention for free?
Authored by: hardmath on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 11:38 AM EDT

Ian Al wrote:

Tell me again: why is it a useful invention?

If I could tell you that, Ian, I'd be in a much stronger bargaining position!

---
"Prolog is an efficient programming language because it is a very stupid theorem prover." -- Richard O'Keefe

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

assuming you wanted to, yeah
Authored by: xtifr on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 12:39 PM EDT
If the poster who claimed it's expiring this year is correct, then yeah, you
probably could use it, should you so want. Personally, I think it looks like a
really poor solution to the problem, and can't imagine why anyone would
<em>want</em> to use it, but yeah. (This is the patent that Java
doesn't even use, no?)

On the other hand, if you happen to have been using it all along, you may still
be in trouble even after it expires. There is, as I understand it, a brief
window after a patent expires where the patent holder can still go after people
for past violations. I was going to point this out earlier, but then I realized
that nobody in their right mind would have been violating the patent in the
first place, so I didn't bother. :)

---
Do not meddle in the affairs of Wizards, for it makes them soggy and hard to
light.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )