|
|
|
| Authored by: pem on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 02:13 PM EDT |
Why should google help out Oracle and Microsoft by separating the wheat (if any
exists) from the chaff?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 03:03 PM EDT |
Google should only do that against patents that Oracle sues them with. Or if
they're feeling nice, patents that Oracle sues some hobbyist FOSS developer
with.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: jonathon on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 03:24 PM EDT |
>starting with their weakest patients, use prior art to file re-examination
requests with the USPTO.
Start with the most recently issued, and work backwards.
File say, ten re-examination requests per day, seven days a week.
If any patent trolls respond negatively,such as retaliates in court, submit
1,000 re-examination requests per hour to the USPTO, (on a 7/24/366 basis)
showing why they were issued in violation US Constitutional Law, US Statute Law,
US Case Law, USPTO Rules and Regulations. Do not forget to include the previous
patents that were issued that covered the same thing as the patent for which
re-examination is requested.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 04:36 PM EDT |
| (n/t) [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
