decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Brown Rudnick: "Sky won't fall if Oracle wins API copyright" | 294 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Brown Rudnick: "Sky won't fall if Oracle wins API copyright"
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 12:20 PM EDT
He's getting so much just slightly wrong I can't do a point-by-point rebuttal.

He is definitly confusing "API" with "API implementation"
though. And I think he got some of the trial details wrong as well.

Did Google ever admit that their copying wasn't de minimus?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It's Edward Naughton again
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 03:17 PM EDT
MS Fudster

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Seems like they want the appeal process from BSF
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 03:21 PM EDT
Larry has got to be dissapointed in BSF performance.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Several priceless statements here
Authored by: pem on Thursday, May 31 2012 @ 04:17 PM EDT
Some of the clamor may be misinformation, but I think a lot of the confusion stems from the imprecise use of terminology, partly because Java is both a programming language and a platform. So let’s start by getting the details right.

The Java programming language was created by Sun (now Oracle) and designed specifically to be able to run on as many hardware and software environments as possible. The Java language has been made available under the General Public License, a free software license.

First, he explains there's a lot of misinformation floating about, then he adds to it by explaining that the "language" is available under the GPL. What a crock!

Then he goes on to list licenses for APIs. Except they aren't. At least not the ones I looked at. They are licenses for accessing things like web functionality through APIs.

And as another commenter noted, he's not shy about conflating specification and implementation where ever possible.

He's either stupid or evil (or both). In any case, we need to insure that potential clients realize that Edward J. Naughton is incompetent to practice law.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )