|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 30 2012 @ 11:07 PM EDT |
Simulators are not the same thing as emulators. The output or the side-
effects are simulated and did not really occur. But with emulators the side
effect did occur on the host. However with virtual machines the side effect
occurred in the virtual machine and thence translated to the host machine.
Me thinks that everybody is going to have slightly different shades of meaning
to each term. This is an example why software patents are bad or why so
much prior art can be found. Would an emulator process violate a simulator
process or a virtual machine process that does the "same" thing?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 30 2012 @ 11:11 PM EDT |
So, if a Java VM runs within a Java VM, then the second Java VM is
virtualized, but not the first? Or does the first become virtualized?
If a Java VM runs within a Dalvik VM, then what?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|