decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Nonsense, read Google's stats | 393 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Remember all the spam selling fake Windows and Office licenses?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 26 2012 @ 08:55 AM EDT

A few years back, all our inboxes (even on Linux-only mail systems) were flooded with Spam advertising incredibly cheap licenses for non-free software, including many MS products. The same stuff was being advertised on web sites, in news groups and other places searchable by Google.

Many of these outfits pretended in their advertising to be using loopholes in the "OEM" hardware bundling discount programs to procure and sell licenses at lower than retail prices, but their prices were so far below actual "OEM" prices that these goods were obviously fake, cracked, photocopied or other forms of real commercial copyright piracy (not the "softlifting" that RIAA/MPAA/SPA fanatics usually persecute).

Thus it is easy to imagine a diligent MS team finding 500.000 such piracy links on Google and sending the proper DMCA notices, completely as expected and accepted by Google and the proponents of DMCA safe harbor protection for the Google's of this world.

The 500.000 number was given as an anti-SOPA argument as to why the music industry should stop whining and demanding extreme legislation for someone elses problems.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Nonsense, read Google's stats
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 27 2012 @ 07:22 PM EDT
http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/copyright/owners/3599/

The vast majority of sites MS are targetting are clearly torrent/warez sites and
are almost certainly not frivilous - there's a *lot* of windows/office ISO's etc
out there.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )