decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
???? Watching the entire show isn't "fair use"? Context Please! | 393 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
???? Watching the entire show isn't "fair use"? Context Please!
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 25 2012 @ 07:29 PM EDT
I bought a magazine subscription one time, and read the articles and looked at
the pictures--but completely skipped the ads.

Several times I've read books and thrown away the book covers which had ads.

I've bought CDs which had ads for more music by the same performers...and felt
no obligation to watch stop and read the ads.

I went to a movie theatre and slipped in late, after the ads were over.

I drove downtown and didn't read any of the billboards, I was so busy watching
the traffic.

I walked through a Barnes and Noble store and didn't stop at their "new
releases" promo table.

I have a mailbox, right beside a trashcan. I receive mail, but throw the grocery
flyers in the trash.

The Fair Use Police haven't arrested me yet.

Please explain how TV shows are morally different, and point to the section of
the law that makes them legally different.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

What's fair?
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 26 2012 @ 12:49 AM EDT
A noticable change in the content on TV is an increasing focus on commercials
(ads) and, consequently, the programming is deliberately planned to keep the
viewer hooked with reality shows, raw emotions, uber-graphical depiction of
violence and/or sex (tears, blood and sperm).
The programming is serving the commercials, not the other way around. Hence the
position of the networks in this is borderline hyprochricy - they have for years
dumbed down public TV to serve ads. As a viewer and parent you are at these
vultures' mercy. Is that fair?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )