decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Propretary was on decline, due to dominance of MS. So, devs went to free software to play with. | 380 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Propretary was on decline, due to dominance of MS. So, devs went to free software to play with.
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 24 2012 @ 04:57 PM EDT
True, Unix story is correct.
However,
The dog that wags the tail is applications.

THE LICENSE is what was being referred to as FOSS and the GPL is not just a
story about LINUX. App devs were able to play around with it at home, at work
(without needing to make a budget case to get/buy licenses for it, etc). So, it
was fun stuff too. And, after looking at code, using others code, giving back
code, etc, discovered the power of it. Sometimes, tried it out at work too,
when nothing else fit, they used it (it became trusted).

So, yes, in statement, was referrning to OS, but mostly to the Apps, because,
the OS is worthless without the Apps.

Think LAMP stack, you gotta have the application.

The LICENSE is key.GPL is wonderful, and easy to understand.

Example story -
IBM started using LINUX because of the LAMP stack, the story is, that one day,
out of the blue, when the CEO was thinging about increasing sales... well the
IBM CEO asked staff a question. Noticed they had this web site up and wondered
why they were not selling web sites? The staff checked on it, reported back that
the software that IBM engineers used for that IBM web site was FREE SOFTWARE,
IBM CEO then asked "can we sell it"? They got back to him telling him
that the GPL license says YES you can sell GPL licensed software. So, the IBM
CEO said let's sell it and support the software we are using. A couple of
years later, IBM had about 2 Billion in sales related to Free software. Note -
it was not MS software, and it was interesting to watch as MS could not buy it,
could not Kill it off (due to License), it was totally FREE as in speech, so MS
feared it because they felt that they could not even embrace it due to the
License that might have been viral to have such GPL licensed code mixed in with
their proprietary code (it was perfect).

So, them is the apples.



[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )