decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Not appeal | 543 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Not appeal
Authored by: jvillain on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 03:04 PM EDT
Well Google did close on Motorola yesterday. So Google is now in good shape if
Oracle wants to play again.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not appeal
Authored by: Steve Martin on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 03:08 PM EDT

Strictly speaking, there was a countersuit here. Google filed fourteen counterclaims against Oracle. Seven were for declaratory judgment of invalidity of the original patents-in-suit, seven were for declaratory judgments of non-infringement. In effect, Google won the only remaining non-infringement counterclaims in play.

---
"When I say something, I put my name next to it." -- Isaac Jaffe, "Sports Night"

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

No appeal until after the "fair use" retrial ...
Authored by: webster on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 03:29 PM EDT
.

... The judgment must be final.

It was 9-3 for Google on Fair Use. If Alsup waits before he decides if API's
are copyrightable, that may be two wasted trials.

.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not appeal
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 25 2012 @ 01:36 AM EDT
A curious game.
The only way to win is not to play.

How about a nice game of chess

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHWjlCaIrQo

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )