Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

And who, pray tell, were the "tech savy jurors"? | 543 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

And who, pray tell, were the "tech savy jurors"?

Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 24 2012 @ 06:13 AM EDT

Perhaps, as he seem to be implying, the foreman was the only one asking the
questions, while everyone else had already decided for Google.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

And who, pray tell, were the "tech savy jurors"?

Authored by: PJ on Thursday, May 24 2012 @ 12:02 PM EDT

It means he doesn't know what tech savvy means
to you. He was marking on a curve, and he's
not tech savvy at all, evidently, so some on
the jury, to *him*, seemed to know more about
tech.

Keep in mind only one juror talked to the press,
the single juror who thought until the very end
that Oracle should win. And he fought for that
and it was he sending all those notes, and in
his comments to the press, it's his world view
being expressed, not the jury as a body. They
never agreed with this guy.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )