Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

"I publish *my* opinions that I stand by 100%, and no one has ever been able to buy my opinions" | 543 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

"I publish *my* opinions that I stand by 100%, and no one has ever been able to buy my opinions"

Authored by: kuroshima on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 04:09 PM EDT

Personally, I think he's being dishonest about being
dishonest. Perfectly coherent mind you.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

limited choices: dishonest or...

Authored by: mcinsand on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 04:32 PM EDT

Okay, Flo, let's just say for giggles that you're not dishonest, that you
actually believe what you write. If you are honest and if you stand by what you
have written, does this (your track record) mean that you simply do not have the
least bit of intelligence for understanding the subject matter?

Given all that you have out there, your choices are limited. Either you do not
believe what you are writing or you are not mentally-equipped to comprehend what
you are discussing.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Just to be clear - that wasn't actually FloMo posting here - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 05:22 PM EDT
- apologies for lack of clarity - Authored by: mcinsand on Thursday, May 24 2012 @ 05:46 AM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )