|
| Authored by: belzecue on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 10:42 AM EDT |
You saw that, right?
oracal-vs-google-trial
^^^^[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 11:03 AM EDT |
| Really ought to be added to the "main" post as it is generally less noisy.
tqft9999's raw feed. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 11:06 AM EDT |
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
Back in Judge Alsup's court this AM. But this time for
securities litigation. Apologies to my techie #googacle
followers.
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
And fair warning to counsel with cases on Alsup's calendar
this AM: his honor is on fire. "he is a fraudster!!" etc.
eeek![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 11:51 AM EDT |
Ginny LaRoe @GinnyLaRoe
::Update on #Googacle news:: jury is deliberating. No notes
this AM. But the morning is young[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 12:41 PM EDT |
Ginny LaRoe @GinnyLaRoe
JURY NOTE in #Googacle. For Google, Bob Van Nest is back. For
Oracle, the usual suspects minus David Boies.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 12:46 PM EDT |
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
Jury question is on 520 patent. But it's too long to tweet.
And Oracle's Jacobs says, "We don't understand the question."[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 12:46 PM EDT |
Ginny LaRoe @GinnyLaRoe
Aw, the legal teams are trying to work out a joint answer.
That will be music to Alsup's ears.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 12:54 PM EDT |
Bryan Bishop ‏@bcbishop
Oracle / Google attys have joint view on latest jury
question: "We don't understand the legal question they're
asking."[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 12:55 PM EDT |
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
Oracle counsel tells judge both sides don't understand jury
question. Solution would be to read some claim language.
Alsup dubious.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 12:57 PM EDT |
| no text [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
