Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Yes, but why be annoyed at both? | 262 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Ford is better than Chevvy

Authored by: argee on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 03:06 PM EDT

Wife: I like the Ford better, it is green.

Hubby: No, the Chevvy is better because it comes with
Bridgestone tires.

Salesman: Boy one of each!

---
--
argee

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Yes, but why be annoyed at both?

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 03:10 PM EDT

Yes, the two sides are in disagreement about some fairly straightforward
technical questions, but one side is telling the truth, and the other side is
not, so why be annoyed at both?

The subtle appearance of bias against Google, at least as reported by the
tweeters, was making me think that the judge is leaning towards thinking that
Oracle is telling the truth and Google is lying, but then he answered that last
question from the jury with the same answer that Google wanted him to give, but
he claimed that he came up with the answer himself because the parties couldn't
agree. So maybe he's annoyed that Google is pretty much right all of the time,
and he's not allowed to come out and say so?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

It's called corporal punishment n/t - Authored by: sd_ip_tech on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 03:46 PM EDT
Yes, but why be annoyed at both? - Authored by: PolR on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 04:03 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )