|
Authored by: hAckz0r on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 09:49 PM EDT |
Did you read the article? Yes, they certainly are reverse engineering those
compeeting products expressly for patent use discovery. It is not that hard to
do if you have the right tools. I do reverse engineering for security purposes,
so I know what it would take to do the detailed work necessary to prove a patent
was used or not. They on the other hand might only be studying application
behavior enough to see if they could have enough technical fud to fool a judge
and begin the extortion law suit. --- DRM - As a "solution", it solves the
wrong problem; As a "technology" its only 'logically' infeasible. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 23 2012 @ 07:52 AM EDT |
I'd guess that the effort to be put into reverse engineering
would be directly proportional to the worth or size of the
intended target. A big company might be more willing to
go to court and fight, where as a small company would just
roll over and pay in light of a litigation threat.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|