Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 12:40 PM EDT |
Caleb is there too :-) [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: feldegast on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 12:45 PM EDT |
Caleb Garling @CalebGarling
Back from five days of camping in the desert (perfect view of
solar eclipse) and now I'm in a federal courtroom.
#NotTheSameThing
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: hardmath on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 01:46 PM EDT |
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
Another note! Heading back to Judge Alsup's court.
---
"Prolog is an efficient programming language because it is a very stupid theorem
prover." -- Richard O'Keefe[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 02:13 PM EDT |
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
Q: If we find a reference that identifies data by numeric
memory location, does its existence preclude existence of a
symbolic reference?
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
Oracle: Existence of numeric ref doesn't preclude symbolic
ref. / Google: Can't be both numeric & symbolic ref.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 02:15 PM EDT |
Caleb Garling @CalebGarling
Back in court for a jury question. Alsup clearly annoyed this
is dragging, calls lawyers "zero help" for reaching official
answer
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
Judge says he's forced to figure it out on his own (""on-ma-
own") since lawyers can't agree on anything. Calls jury in.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 02:16 PM EDT |
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
Judge explains for any given "location" it can't be both
numeric & symbolic reference. it's got to be one or the
other.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 02:17 PM EDT |
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
Judge back to encouraging counsel to give 5 minute arguments
to jury to help 'splain things. Oracle says YES! Google: No.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 02:22 PM EDT |
Ginny tweets:
Judge back to encouraging counsel to give 5 minute arguments to jury to help
'splain things. Oracle says YES! Google: No.
Curiously that's the opposite of what they thought last time this came up
(Friday IIRC).[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 03:36 PM EDT |
Ginny LaRoe ‏@GinnyLaRoe
Jurors will only deliberate for another 30 mins today.
#Googacle[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|