decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
the choice of the 37 accused packages was made by Oracle | 214 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
the choice of the 37 accused packages was made by Oracle
Authored by: Chromatix on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 08:52 PM EDT
IIRC, the initial list for infringement was 50-odd, reduced because Sun/Oracle didn't originally write some of them.

Java and Android both also contain a large number of packages not in common.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

the choice of the 37 accused packages was made by Oracle
Authored by: hardmath on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 07:35 AM EDT

See this subthread, Which are the 37 APIs? and my Correction subpost. The accused APIs all have filenames beginning with java or javax, and in the current Android SDK there are 53 like this, pretty close to the 51 APIs that Oracle initially accused.

For example java.math is certainly needed for interoperability and was originally in Oracle's list of accused APIs. But Oracle removed it in revising the complaint, along with ten APIs related to concurrency and XML, if I remember correctly.

Apache Harmony 5 provided 129 packages with names beginning java or javax, along with some additional packages beginning with org (many of which seem to be used by Android).

It might well be argued that Google's subset of APIs eliminated some core Java APIs (like AWT) that were not essential having been improved upon by alternatives (like SWING).

---
"Prolog is an efficient programming language because it is a very stupid theorem prover." -- Richard O'Keefe

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )