Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Punting on the SSO Copyrightability Q. | 214 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Punting on the SSO Copyrightability Q.

Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 08:49 PM EDT

Actually since the burden of proof is on Oracle, if no evidence was presented
that the SSO is copyrightable, this may mean the Judge can 'punt' the
question since Oracle failed to present evidence that it was.

-Ish

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Punting on the SSO Copyrightability Q. - Authored by: PolR on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 09:28 PM EDT
- Punting on the SSO Copyrightability Q. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 09:34 PM EDT
  - Punting on the SSO Copyrightability Q. - Authored by: PolR on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 03:58 AM EDT
  - Punting on the SSO Copyrightability Q. - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 05:42 AM EDT
    - Punting on the SSO Copyrightability Q. - Authored by: BJ on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 02:28 PM EDT

Evidence in the record

Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 02:35 AM EDT

The problem is that due to the time limitations offered during the case Google
never had time to get all the evidence into the trial record. They had to make
hard priorities about what to include to respond to what Oracle presented.
Oracle of course never suffered from this since their case build on everything
besides actual evidence.

Actually I think Oracles repeated change of infringement theory is very much
aimed at preventing Google the chance to bring in a coherrent record of evidence
and expert testomony.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )