decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Interoperability of programmers | 214 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Interoperability of programmers
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 02:27 AM EDT
Well one problem is that the business strategy you point out for Sun was about
how making Java open makes more developers develop for it which means more users
paying for their Java solution. However if we apply that to Android they don't
get much because Sun/Oracle don't make any Dalvik VM's to license out. They
make money from enterprise Java use but if an enterprise uses an android app for
something they get nothing. You could argue that Android promotes the Java
Language and there is therefore an indirect boost to Java's J2SE/EE enterprise
revenue but Oracle wants some direct money from what they see as the future
market.

As more and more Java developers start using Android they are worried these
people will stop paying for Java licenses. Imagine in the future if someone
decides to port Dalvik to Windows/Mac/Linux and allow you to run Android apps on
a PC! Imagine if Google creates a windows 8 Metro equivalent that works on
Windows/Mac/Linux and moves Java to the forefront of PC development as well.
All scary things for someone trying to make money off the old Java business
model.

But should they be able to stop innovation and progress just because it hurts
their bottom line?

Michael

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )