decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
? Java->Dalvik == C->C++ ? | 214 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
? Java->Dalvik == C->C++ ?
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 09:21 AM EDT
Google has chosen to use Dalvik because it didn't want to be bind by the Java
license. It wanted to be free to choose which packages it wanted to have or not
in Android.
Applying for the Java license would have obliged Google to put all the JRE (or
the JME) in Android.
Neither version was convenient: to big for the JRE, to small for JME (and who
need yet another phone with JME!)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Not really
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 09:23 AM EDT
? Java->Dalvik == C->C++ ?

Not really.

Android uses Java syntax and keywords, but doesn't really support new ones. It pretty much uses java as a language. The differences are that the VMs are implemented differently, bytecodes and compiled code are not compatible, and a different subset of APIs are provided.

The only different syntax that's really used is the XML layout stuff, and app config files - which are just "compiled" into regular java source files by the SDK tools as and when they are changed. I think similar ideas are in play in some of the J2EE config files.

I don't think the comparison is a good one

In terms of the difference in supported APIs, android is perhaps more comparable to J2ME vs J2SE conceptually (though massively more powerful and useful), but that misses the differences in bytecode and VM architecture.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Android != JME - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 01:56 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )