|
|
|
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:29 PM EDT |
Rachel King ‏@ZDNetRachel
Time for another jury note. Back in courtroom and based on lawyers looking
through stuff, looks like it might be more testimony readbacks[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: feldegast on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:36 PM EDT |
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Looks like there might actually be three jury questions. Van
Nest says he's ready on first two, but asking for a few
minutes on the third
when posting tweets, gotta remember to remove the funny
characters before the @
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:49 PM EDT |
This one has fewer people tweeting on it, most of the people on it are reporters
directly in the courtroom.
tqft9999's feed. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Alternative Raw Feed - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:52 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:53 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Does resolution of symbolic refs happen immediately? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:55 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Google advises 'yes' on immediate symbolic referencing. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:56 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Judge thinking on what to say to jury. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 02:02 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Is stack == memory? Oracle says no, google acknowledges in part - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 02:10 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Judge tires of bickering lawyers, calls jury in. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 02:12 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Judge says memory not confined to stack. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 02:14 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Judge repeats definition of symbolic reference, does not give y/n answer. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 02:20 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Judge unable to answer remaining questions, invites more notes. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 02:22 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed: Both sides object to jury instructions; Judge gets testy. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 02:24 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - New jury note! - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 03:53 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Does any resolution of symbolic reference in data fields infringing? - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 04:00 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Oracle says yes, google says no. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 04:02 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Jury Called in - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 04:05 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed: Judge says all claims must be met, again says can't answer Q's about facts - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 04:09 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Judge states he trusts the jury to get it right. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 04:12 PM EDT
- Alternative Raw Feed - Judge tells lawyers to start thinking about possible hung jury. - Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 04:14 PM EDT
| |
| Authored by: feldegast on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:52 PM EDT |
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Jury: Can we determine a numeric reference instruction to
become symbolic because of what happens downstream? Oracle
says yes.
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: feldegast on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:55 PM EDT |
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Jury also asks: Regarding symbolic reference in '104 claims,
does the resolution of symbolic references need to happen
immediately.
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: hardmath on Tuesday, May 22 2012 @ 12:05 PM EDT |
Rachel has the tweet...
---
"Prolog is an efficient programming language because it is a very stupid theorem
prover." -- Richard O'Keefe[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
