|
|
|
| Authored by: BJ on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 03:59 PM EDT |
Fixed that for 'ye.
;-)
bjd
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: celtic_hackr on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 04:08 PM EDT |
Since the jury has dueling evidence, one expert against another, it seems clear
it is not proven. There is nothing here to tip the scales to proven. You have
two apparently credible witnesses, and each say something diametrically
opposite. There is no other supporting or denying evidence. Hence not proven,
and not disproven. But the burden is to prove, not to disprove. Therefore, there
can be only one verdict. In favor of the defendant.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
| |
| Authored by: sd_ip_tech on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 04:32 PM EDT |
That, imo, is a red herring. These "experts" were selected for their
believability in court. It's the substance that counts. I don't believe the jury
can descern any ulterior motive from dueling Phds. They (jury) simply do not
have the background to tell the dif. AMD with all the junk that Oracle has
provided it is understandable.
---
sd_ip_tech[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|
