decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
How are average people supposed to understand | 286 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
And everyone knows dihydrogen monoxide is what's hazardous
Authored by: jjs on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 06:12 PM EDT
;)

---
(Note IANAL, I don't play one on TV, etc, consult a practicing attorney, etc,
etc)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

How are average people supposed to understand
Authored by: DieterWasDriving on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 08:10 PM EDT
The food naming bogosity is a hot-button issue for me.

Many foods are named after their region of development, and were very quickly
made elsewhere.

Starting with the formation of the EU, once-generic names can now be owned.
Names that only came into common use because they were long free to use are
being claimed by people that had no part in the original creation.

You might not have thought of it in these terms, but it's an example of
privatizing and "monetizing" what once existed for the public good.
These aren't trademarks created from whole cloth by a company and used
exclusively for that product. These are descriptions that were originally
intended to give credit to a region, but shouldn't be *owned* by a small set of
businesses or landowners that happen to be in that region.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )