decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
You want to abolish responsibility for past actions? | 361 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
You want to abolish responsibility for past actions?
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 20 2012 @ 01:30 PM EDT
Huh? If Sun says "law x is damaging to business because it means that companies are able to do y", that does not mean that Sun is precluded from doing y itself, as long as law x is in place. Why should they be treated worse than their competitors, just because they have stated that x is a bad idea?

Most certainly Sun has involved in the past action of stating that software patent laws are a bad idea with bad effects. But the court does not make the laws, and is not in the position to question them. Whether or not Sun or anybody else considers those laws a bad idea (or has considered them as such in the past), they are a given for the sake of the court.

If anything, this case sends a strong reinforcement to law makers: "See why those laws are a bad idea? We told you, but you chose not to listen. As long as you keep this legislation in place, we are, like anybody else, not just subjected, but also entitled to its consequences."

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )