decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Law is certainly not my field | 361 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Law is certainly not my field
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 02:58 PM EDT

It's hardly as easy as that to invalidate a patent as a patent on an "idea". A trivial exception to this is standards-essential patents, which you could work around but can't if you want to maintain interoperability.

This case is similar, except the standards here are not really mandatory... unless you want to officially be known as a Java implementation: the patents appear to be intimately tied to optimizations and execution of Java bytecode. Android re-implements its own VM, but the bytecode it uses as an intermediate compilation step is perfectly spec-compliant. One way to work around that would be to compile Java directly to assembly, but of course, writing an optimizing compiler as good as the ones already out there is no trivial task. Seems much easier, instead, to just use optimized bytecode and translate to ARM assembly.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )