decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Jury still confused on Q1 of 3 on 104 patent | 361 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Another jury note
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 12:29 PM EDT
Rachel King ‏@ZDNetRachel
Time for a jury note! Dump your coffee and scramble to the
courtroom.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The waiting!! (n/t)
Authored by: hardmath on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 12:30 PM EDT
.

---
"Prolog is an efficient programming language because it is a very stupid theorem
prover." -- Richard O'Keefe

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Did they dump coffee on their dresses or what?!
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 12:35 PM EDT
its been 13 min and no update!! :/

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Jury wants another readback on 104 patent
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 12:36 PM EDT
Rachel King ‏@ZDNetRachel
Jury wants another readback -- this time over '104 patent.
Not surprising considering how much more dense patent
evidence is

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Court reporter asked to repeat answer to previous question
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 12:43 PM EDT
Rachel King ‏@ZDNetRachel
Court reporter actually being asked to reread an answer to
previous jury question. Either jurors forgot answer or still
confused over it

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Judge in cheerful mood. "They can send another note if they want more"
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 12:44 PM EDT
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Judge says he hopes that answers the jury question. If not,
they can send another note. He seems like he's in a cheerful
mood today too.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Another jury note. More testimony readbacks?
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:33 PM EDT
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Time for another jury note. Back in courtroom and based on
lawyers looking through stuff, looks like it might be more
testimony readbacks

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

3 Jury questions - van Nest ready for two of them but needs some minutes for the third
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:35 PM EDT
Rachel King ‏@ZDNetRachel
Looks like there might actually be three jury questions. Van
Nest says he's ready on first two, but asking for a few
minutes on the third

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"Can we determine a numeric reference instruction to become symbolic..." - Oracle: "yes"
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:51 PM EDT
Rachel King ‏@ZDNetRachel
Jury: Can we determine a numeric reference instruction to
become symbolic because of what happens downstream? Oracle
says yes.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Jury still confused on Q1 of 3 on 104 patent
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:54 PM EDT
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Jury still looks confused over symbolic references ('104
patent, which means we're back to Q1 of 3 on verdict form)


(But they aren't necessarily answering the questions in
order...)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Jury: "does the resolution of symbolic references need to happen immediately"
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:55 PM EDT
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Jury also asks: Regarding symbolic reference in '104 claims,
does the resolution of symbolic references need to happen
immediately.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Van Nest: "Yes - or at least reference must be contained in instructions"
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:57 PM EDT
Rachel King ‏@ZDNetRachel
On that, Google's Van Nest advised answer should be yes or at
least symbolic reference must be contained in instructions

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )