decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Galileo (is it happening again)? Are we going to have to wait that long for software=math? | 361 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Galileo (is it happening again)? Are we going to have to wait that long for software=math?
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 09:06 AM EDT
Galileo (is it happening again where true science is the
"foe of progress")?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei

"July 1633, concluded with his being threatened with torture
if he did not tell the truth, but he maintained his denial
despite the threat.[58] The sentence of the Inquisition was
delivered on June 22. It was in three essential parts:"

"Galileo was found "vehemently suspect of heresy"

"He was sentenced to formal imprisonment at the pleasure of
the Inquisition."

"His offending Dialogue was banned"

-----------Then, how many years later...
"On 31 October 1992, Pope John Paul II expressed regret for
how the Galileo affair was handled, and issued a declaration
acknowledging the errors committed by the Catholic Church
tribunal that judged the scientific positions of Galileo
Galilei, as the result of a study conducted by the
Pontifical Council for Culture.[145][146] In March 2008 the
head of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Nicola Cabibbo,
announced a plan to honour Galileo by erecting a statue of
him inside the Vatican walls.[147] In December of the same
year, during events to mark the 400th anniversary of
Galileo's earliest telescopic observations, Pope Benedict
XVI praised his contributions to astronomy.[148] A month
later, however, the head of the Pontifical Council for
Culture, Gianfranco Ravasi, revealed that the plan to erect
a statue of Galileo in the grounds of the Vatican had been
suspended.[149]"

So, statue issue, a piece of carved stone? Hmmm, Why is it,
that someone, whoever it is, or if a group even,
still whoever, can't get to the point where he can be
"officially" honored?

Question - is there still debate in
some circles as to what he did, vs what they did, where
someone has a problem with science to the point that they
can admit no wrong?

So, are we going to have to wait that long for software to
be seen as MATH?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )