Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 12:29 PM EDT |
Rachel King ‏@ZDNetRachel
Time for a jury note! Dump your coffee and scramble to the
courtroom.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: hardmath on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 12:30 PM EDT |
.
---
"Prolog is an efficient programming language because it is a very stupid theorem
prover." -- Richard O'Keefe[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 12:35 PM EDT |
its been 13 min and no update!! :/ [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 12:36 PM EDT |
Rachel King ‏@ZDNetRachel
Jury wants another readback -- this time over '104 patent.
Not surprising considering how much more dense patent
evidence is[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 12:43 PM EDT |
Rachel King ‏@ZDNetRachel
Court reporter actually being asked to reread an answer to
previous jury question. Either jurors forgot answer or still
confused over it[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 12:44 PM EDT |
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Judge says he hopes that answers the jury question. If not,
they can send another note. He seems like he's in a cheerful
mood today too.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:33 PM EDT |
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Time for another jury note. Back in courtroom and based on
lawyers looking through stuff, looks like it might be more
testimony readbacks[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:35 PM EDT |
Rachel King ‏@ZDNetRachel
Looks like there might actually be three jury questions. Van
Nest says he's ready on first two, but asking for a few
minutes on the third[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:51 PM EDT |
Rachel King ‏@ZDNetRachel
Jury: Can we determine a numeric reference instruction to
become symbolic because of what happens downstream? Oracle
says yes.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:54 PM EDT |
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Jury still looks confused over symbolic references ('104
patent, which means we're back to Q1 of 3 on verdict form)
(But they aren't necessarily answering the questions in
order...)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:55 PM EDT |
Rachel King @ZDNetRachel
Jury also asks: Regarding symbolic reference in '104 claims,
does the resolution of symbolic references need to happen
immediately.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 21 2012 @ 01:57 PM EDT |
Rachel King ‏@ZDNetRachel
On that, Google's Van Nest advised answer should be yes or at
least symbolic reference must be contained in instructions[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|