decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
A System & Method... | 361 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I think there are a lot of interested amateurs and techies
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 20 2012 @ 04:43 AM EDT
Spending a let of time following these cases who would be willing to spend
the time more fruitfully helping out if there were some good overall guidelines

on how to do so from a legal point of view.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

A System & Method...
Authored by: Gringo_ on Sunday, May 20 2012 @ 10:43 AM EDT

Is there scope and interest enough to take "The Groklaw Principle" to the next level? Is there interest enough from this community to participate? Is this something that we can make bigger and more useful than any one of us combined?

Yes, yes, and yes.

If this has potential, then perhaps we could ask PJ and Mark to come up with...

No, no, and no.

The thing is, how can we possibly ask Mark & PJ to take this added task on? We can't, nor is this the appropriate forum for an action plan. The Free Software Foundation (FSF) would be the appropriate place for this, if they had the funding to take this on.

I have often thought of how we could work together as a community to bring about profound change. For example, suppose we had a well-funded staff of lawyers, and started challenging random software patents by the hundreds, even thousands, swamping the system with these challenges? Wouldn't that be powerful?

For example, instead of random, focus on the portfolio of the biggest patent rolls, like Intellectual Ventures, or Microsoft. How would these organizations feel to suddenly find their patents under attack by the dozens, hundreds even, in dozens of different venues, even all over the world, at the same time? Wow - what a delicious thought!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Why didn't Google...
Authored by: BJ on Sunday, May 20 2012 @ 12:34 PM EDT
...early put a Request For Comment on the major aspects
of the instant case upon the FSF and/or Groklaw (or even
broader than that...)?

I mean even before they were served?

Many eyes make... <whatever>

bjd


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )