decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
what oracle weeded out. | 319 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I have been pushing that thought to the back of my mind
Authored by: Ian Al on Saturday, May 19 2012 @ 12:24 PM EDT
If there is just one hold-out in each phase, my conspiracy detector will go off
the scale.

Mind you, it is a Winphone 7.5 app and probably not something you want to take
too seriously.

---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

what oracle weeded out.
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 19 2012 @ 12:41 PM EDT
"I'm thinking the questions were designed so either side could weed out the
candidates who may hold beliefs detrimental to their respective causes."

yep.. Oracle weeded out anyone that knew anything about programming... or
computers.. bet they wish they could weed out the judge due to his terribly
inconvenient knowledge of programming. It's really hard to bamboozle someone
when they know more about the subject matter than you do.

As for the jury.. I think the hold out actually helped Google in the copyright
phase.. Keep in mind that back the jury didn't know the blog was official for
sun and a few other things that have become known... I suspect the hold out was
the one stopping them deciding fair use wasn't a valid excuse in this instance.
But we won't really know that until it's all over.

cheers

Franki


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Non-unanimity helps Google
Authored by: scav on Sunday, May 20 2012 @ 06:35 AM EDT
Correct me if I'm wrong...

If the jury can't render a unanimous verdict, Google are
entitled to a mistrial. By the time it gets tried again,
the patents are probably going to be invalidated.

If a member of the jury was lying about something that would
have got them excluded in voir dire, then you also get a
mistrial (they may have been using knowledge that wasn't
presented in evidence to try to sway the other jurors).

So Google don't need to do any digging.

Since Oracle don't want a mistrial, it's not in their
interests to go digging either. But their interests would
have best been served by not shovelling this case, steaming
and buzzing with flies, into the courtroom in the first
place, so who knows what they'll do.

---
The emperor, undaunted by overwhelming evidence that he had no clothes,
redoubled his siege of Antarctica to extort tribute from the penguins.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )