Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

RT-11 Linker (Heathkit and Clones) | 319 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

RT-11 Linker (Heathkit and Clones)

Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 18 2012 @ 04:20 PM EDT

Heathkit sold a clone, I don't remember the model number but you could attach 2
8" drives in an external cabinet and RSX-11 as I recall did run on it. I
ditched the 8" diskettes years ago and a Fortran compiler diskette. Oh
what that might bring on eBay now ;-)

We sold quite of few of these to the University of Louisville.

p.s. it was a kit but the CPU and DISK controller were pre-assembled from
Heathkit.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Heathkit H-11 - Authored by: betajet on Friday, May 18 2012 @ 04:32 PM EDT
RT-11 Linker (Heathkit and Clones) - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 18 2012 @ 04:57 PM EDT

They were not clones.

Authored by: jesse on Friday, May 18 2012 @ 06:40 PM EDT

The chips used (and in some cases the total CPU board) were purchased from DEC
and repackaged.

This was part of the goal of the LSI-11, to become what Intel is. A manufacturer
of CPUs.

Unfortunately, the bean counters took control of DEC and suddenly information
about and use of the various parts disappeared.

This made it difficult to develop device drivers for the VAX unless those
devices used the old UNIBUS/Qbus architecture.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

They were not clones. - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 19 2012 @ 02:52 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )