decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Through the Looking Glass | 44 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Through the Looking Glass
Authored by: dio gratia on Friday, May 18 2012 @ 04:56 PM EDT

No not a chapter heading, only shows up one place in Through the looking glass (PDF, 1.2 MB) - the chapter on Humpty Dumpty. An expansion to more context shows it likely contains a multiplicity of messages that can be taken as applicable to the present case.

‘I don’t know what you mean by “glory,” ’ Alice said.


Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. ‘Of course you don’t – till I tell you. I meant “there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!”'

‘But “glory” doesn’t mean “a nice knock-down argument,” ’ Alice objected.

‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.’


‘The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’
‘

The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master – that’s all.’

Alice was too much puzzled to say anything, so after a minute Humpty Dumpty began again. ‘

They’ve a temper, some of them – particularly verbs, they’re the proudest – adjectives you can do anything with, but not verbs – however, I can manage the whole lot of them! Impenetrability! That’s what I say!’

‘Would you tell me, please,’ said Alice ‘what that means?’

‘Now you talk like a reasonable child,’ said Humpty Dumpty, looking very much pleased. ‘I meant by “impenetrability” that we’ve had enough of that subject, and it would be just as well if you’d mention what you mean to do next, as I suppose you don’t mean to stop here all the rest of your life.’

‘That’s a great deal to make one word mean,’ Alice said in a thoughtful tone.

‘When I make a word do a lot of work like that,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘I always pay it extra.’

‘Oh!’ said Alice. She was too much puzzled to make any other remark.

‘Ah, you should see ’em come round me of a Saturday night,’ Humpty Dumpty went on, wagging his head gravely from side to side, ‘for to get their wages, you know.’

(Alice didn’t venture to ask what he paid them with; and so you see I can’t tell you.)

The first two exchanges could be taken as a comment on Oracle's trial by bushwhacking tactics. The last bit including the part in parenthesis could be taken as a dig about Oracle grants to Stanford. Adjectives as regular employees (engineers), verbs as professors consultants. The impenetrability demonstrating rope-a-dope. The passage might likely include many more messages with a little contemplation.

The following bit on explaining the poem Jabberwocky is probably very applicable too, as a tug on the beard of patent claim language. That a lawyer might find so much in one passage of 'Through the Looking Glass' to communicate about the present case tells you how important wordsmith work is to the legal profession. I'd imagine the person selecting the reference finds similarities with a lot of his court cases in the writings of Lewis Carroll.

The question also is, were these subliminal messages and were they received by the intended recipients?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )