decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Big claim there, have any proof? | 132 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Big claim there, have any proof?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 18 2012 @ 05:43 AM EDT
What makes you say that?

Free Software is already mostly free of patent claims from it's authors.

Can you point me at a lawsuit brought by the *author* of a free software project
about patents from use of that project?

Not counting a project where the author was bought out, like the current one.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

And so it should be
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 18 2012 @ 09:24 AM EDT
Patent royalties should really be calculated as a percentage of the monetary benefit that the patented idea contributes to a product. Nothing other than a percentage makes sense, because if absolute figures are used for royalties then a product that uses a large number of patented ideas could be required to pay more than 100% of its cost in royalties. It's logical nonsense to demand more in royalties than the fractional contribution which the patented idea has made to the product.

So if commonsense ruled and percentages were used, FOSS software that is also free as in beer would automatically be free of royalties to pay.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )