Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

This makes no sense | 402 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

This makes no sense

Authored by: Christian on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 03:26 PM EDT

You forget that there is no jury decision yet on infringement of the SSO.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

This makes no sense - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 04:11 PM EDT
- This makes no sense - Authored by: PolR on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 04:21 PM EDT
  - This makes no sense - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 08:37 PM EDT
- those aren't separable - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 04:21 PM EDT
  - those aren't separable - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 05:46 PM EDT
    - those aren't separable - Authored by: PolR on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 05:59 PM EDT
    - If they were separable they would hava had a different number on the jury form - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 07:13 PM EDT

What happens after the appeals?

Authored by: jbb on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 05:08 PM EDT

There is a very high likelihood that whoever loses will appeal therefore it might take many years before a future jury ever hears the SSO claims again. The choice in the document explicitly hinges on whether the SSO claim is "ultimately submitted to a jury". If you are suggesting the document should have instead hinged on a decision by Judge Alsup in the current case then I agree with you wholeheartedly.

---
Our job is to remind ourselves that there are more contexts
than the one we’re in now — the one that we think is reality.
-- Alan Kay

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Google is certain of their position - Authored by: softbear on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 05:38 PM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )