decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
PTO Director Compares 'Smartphone Wars' to Patent Battles of Old | 402 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
PTO Director Compares 'Smartphone Wars' to Patent Battles of Old
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 17 2012 @ 09:34 AM EDT
There is a big difference between protecting your own (real and specific)
inventions and forcing competitors out of the market (by/and/or) suing
them over obvious, over-broad, or otherwise ridiculous patents that
should have never been issued in the first place. Before, patents were
used to maintain competition and encourage innovation. Now, it is used
as an anti-competitive tool to lock customers in to a single solution,
punnish innovators for daring to think for themselves, and thwart/
destroy competition. That is the difference.

Companies today don't want to compete. They want people to buy their
products and shut up about it. Obvious (or otherwise ridiculous) patents
are enabling them to do so. This is NOT what patent law was designed
for, and some of us see the perversion for what it is, and that it sickens
the heart and soul of what makes this country so great.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

PTO Director Compares 'Smartphone Wars' to Patent Battles of Old
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 17 2012 @ 10:34 AM EDT
What will be the total cost of those Apple patents before the record is set straight? Or are they really original? New Apple keyboard patent... / Apple introduces the Steering Wheel Remote Control

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )