Groklaw - Digging for Truth

	When you want to know more...

Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines

ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

You won't find me on Facebook

Donate

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments

Sponsors

Hosting:

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

Jury heading home - no decision today | 402 comments | Create New Account

Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.

Jury heading home - no decision today

Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 06:11 PM EDT

I read that as "Judge asked them if there was still a case."

Wishfull thinking on my part, I guess.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Jury quality

Authored by: Ian Al on Thursday, May 17 2012 @ 05:30 AM EDT

After phase 1, the judge still underestimates the quality of the jury. I forgive
the judge. They are asking questions that would not have occurred to me.

Mind you, I have not looked too closely at the jury questions because I get too
stressed and I also attempt to answer them based on Groklaw briefings.

I was about to warn against counting one's chickens when I had the mental
picture of the lawyer in the Simpsons (or, was it Family Guy?).

There you go; another totally stressful day.

---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid!

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

The Hyper-Chicken Lawyer is a Futurama character. - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 17 2012 @ 11:10 AM EDT
- You have a misspent old age! - Authored by: Ian Al on Thursday, May 17 2012 @ 11:24 AM EDT

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )