decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Google is certain of their position | 402 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Google is certain of their position
Authored by: softbear on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 05:38 PM EDT
Google is so sure of the non-copyrightability of the SSO, that they are willing to stipulate to this "short cut" to avoid more FUD now. They will be able to put this behind them; no one will think that Oracle will win this on appeal (given past positions of the 9th Circuit, backed up the recent decision on APIs in Europe), so things will settle down rapidly.

Of course, that depends on the judge ruling as expected, but Google has every reason to believe that it is what it is. Alsop is just being as careful as he can with that ruling. Considering how many briefs he's drawn out of them both on the question, it's hard to see how they would be able to come up with reasonable grounds for an appeal, provided he has addressed all of BSFs outrageous theories up front. His repeated admonitions 'to bring it up now' or forever hold their peace have been rather effective, I think.

I would not want to play poker with the Honorable Judge Alsop.


---
IANAL, etc.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )