Oracle preferred to talk about Polar Bear in their brief, possibly skipping the other one mentioned.

Because they only had 6 hours to write it, they wrote one short paragraph about why each of Polar Bear and a handful of other cases supported their theory of what the law is. They also reused tech snippets from older filings.

They spent most of their brief providing multiple ways they might try to prove Google owes them at least $10 using only evidence allowed in Phase 3 (including hopes about how Google execs might incriminate themselves on the stand).

(I read somewhere that $10 is the magic limit for how little federal courts will deal with)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]