|
Authored by: The Cornishman on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 03:36 PM EDT |
If there's useful information in the internals of the compiler, you are Free to
instrument it and output that information any way you like. You can do that
without offering the source code modifications to the world, if you are content
not to distribute your modified version. Even if rms didn't care for your
modification on political grounds [1], and didn't accept your changes into the
trunk, you're still able to fork GCC.
[1] I'd like to understand how intermediate results of compilation might offend
Mr Stallman's sensibilities, though, if you have a moment to explain..
---
(c) assigned to PJ
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 01:11 AM EDT |
The license is politically driven -- OK.
I'd say it
was economically driven. Your payment for using my code is you must publish
your modifications to my code. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|